
SPQK
Homepage
Proposal
Divisions
Coordinator
Jobs
Conferences
ICQ7
Actual
DFG
Institute
Max-Planck-Society
|
The last SPQK-symposium in 1999 took place at the
Max-Planck-Institute for Physics of Complex Systems (MPIPKS) in Dresden
on December, 19-21. It was sponsored by the DFG-Schwerpunkt
"Quasicrystals: Structure and Physical Properties" (SPQK) and the
MPIPKS. Due to the funds of the MPIPKS it was possible
to invite many guests from outside the SPQK. The topic of the
Symposium, "Diffraction -- Theory and Practice", brought together
33 researchers from both sides, theory and experiment.
The program consisted mainly of longer plenary talk. Most of them were
devided into two parts. In the first part, an introduction was given for the
non-speciallists. The second (bigger) part was devoted to the
state of the art knowledge of the field. The length of the talks
gave enough time for questions and detailed discussions, and both, the
speakers and the audience, used this freedom
during and after the talks.
The program started with a theory session on Sunday morning.
Michael Baake (Tuebingen) discussed the current state of knowledge about the
question: "Which state of matter diffracts". Although this question
was posted (by Bomberi and Taylor) shortly after the discovery of
quasicrystals by Dan Shechtman in 1984, the answer is far more
complicated than expected. We have to be aware that there are many (more
or less)
ordered structures even beyond quasiperiodicity that can give rise to
Bragg oder Bragg-like diffraction spectra. And we have to take
into account that their contribution can spoil our interpretation
of present day data.
Afterwards, Veit Elser (Cornell) gave an intuitive approach to the diffraction
properties of random tiling structures focussing on the additional
non Bragg-like part of the spectra. The theory session was closed
by Moritz Hoeffe (Tuebingen). He showed diffraction properties of several
examples, with focus on the diffuse background.
In the first experimental session, Conradin Beeli (Zuerich) gave a review
about electron microscopy. After an introdution to several technical aspects,
he focused on the achievements and the problems of electron imaging.
The monday morning session was opend by Eveline Weidner (Muenchen) who gave
the introduction to the different aspects of X-ray scattering. She supplied
the audiance with knowledge about the experimental setups, the
experimental data collection and the usual approximations.
Afterwards Fritz Frey (Muenchen) spoke about what we know and what we can do
with X-ray scattering concerning the structure analysis of quasicrystals.
In the afternoon, Marc de Boissieu (Grenoble) summarized the knowledge about
neutron scattering, the state of the art and the problems.
All three big experimental sessions were brought into one line by the speakers
so that the audience could follow the advantages and disadvantages
of the different techniques.
On Tuesday morning, Stephen Pennycook (Oak Ridge) spoke about Z-contrast
imaging in general and its application to aperiodic crystals in particular.
He introduced the
audience to this relatively new technique and outlined its potential
power. But he also clearly marked the possible pitfalls.
The second morning talk was given by Veit Elser who gave an
overview about his method of phase-reconstruction called "Principle
of Minimum Charge". This method can become an alternative approach
(compared with e.g. the maximum entropy method) in structure analysis.
The end of the official program was a talk of Dr. Takakura (Tsukuba) about
"Modelling and Structure Refinement of Quasicrystals".
All talks were embedded into lively discussions so that the timeslots
for the individual talks were filled out. But because all participants
were accomodated in the guest-houses of the MPIPKS there was enough
time for discussions even after the talks. The familiar ambiente
of the MPIPKS is for sure a major factor for every meeting of this kind.
For the organizers it is an easy and pleasant job to be responsible
for a symposium which is supported by the professional conference team
of this institute. So it is our pleasure to thank the MPIPKS for the
additional funding of our meeting and Mrs. Katrin Lantsch
for her organisational work before and during the conference.
Last but not least we want to thank the speakers who did a real good (and
sometimes exhausting) job and the audience who contributed with
comments, questions and answers. We hope that the SPQK can continue
to support meetings like this.
Dresden,
Dieter Joseph
(joseph@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
)
|